The National Association of Proprietors of Private Schools (NAPPS) and the All Nigeria Conference of Principals of Public Schools (ANCOPPS) have called for an immediate review of a Junior Secondary School Three (JSS3) science textbook that contains controversial content on abortion methods.
The textbook, which includes descriptions of procedures such as Dilation and Curettage (D&C) and Dilation and Evacuation (D&E), has been widely condemned by both organisations. NAPPS stated that the material was inappropriate for the national curriculum, while ANCOPPS President, Musa Ibrahim, revealed that investigations had been launched to determine how the book entered schools.
“This content is not part of the approved curriculum, and principals have been directed to seize any copies of the textbook pending further action,” Ibrahim said.
The controversy arose after a viral post on X (formerly known as Twitter) by Alex Onyia, a concerned user, ignited public outrage. Onyia shared screenshots of the textbook’s content, calling it “inappropriate for learners,” which led to widespread debate across the country. Many parents and educators criticised the explicit material, arguing that it was unsuitable for students aged 13-16.
“The inclusion of such content sets a dangerous precedent for young minds,” said one critic responding to Onyia’s post.
In contrast, some individuals defended the content, arguing that it provides necessary information about reproductive health. “Students should be educated on the risks of abortion and teenage pregnancy,” one supporter commented online.
The Federal Ministry of Education has also distanced itself from the textbook, with officials clarifying that the Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) had not approved its use. They affirmed that steps would be taken to ensure only approved materials are used in schools.
As the debate continues, education and health professionals are urging a comprehensive review of the textbook. Many have raised concerns about the psychological and moral impact of exposing young students to such sensitive topics. While some advocate for reproductive health education, others insist that the current content is unsuitable for the age group.
The incident highlights the broader issue of monitoring educational materials to ensure they align with societal values and developmental appropriateness for learners.
See tweets on X below 👇
